Athlete cycle vs bodybuilder cycle
Hi guys, I used to be a lurker on the old PP boards, and I always felt like the information you guys contributed was far above the normal keyboard warrior. So, I come to you all for help on questions I just can't seem to find a solid answer to. What are the differences between athlete and bodybuilder cycles?
For athletes needing explosive power and agility along with good conditioning (weight gain is acceptable but not the main goal), what can they get the most benefit from? This is just going off what I've read, but....
Dianabol and Anavar can cause painful muscle pumps, forcing a lower volume of work. Not a good idea, especially when it comes to conditioning workouts.
Winstrol causes joint issues, which in my opinion is a deal breaker for anyone participating in contact sports.
Tren causes a reduction in cardiovascular conditioning.
Deca/EQ are detectable for too long.
It seems like the only thing worth using is test. Am I correct in this conclusion? Would the dosage be the same? Did I overlook something potentially useful?
I've also heard of athletes going on short (2-3 week) cycles, but most of what I've read here says you'll lose all the gains when you go off. It makes sense to me, but that's also mainly talking about muscle mass. Does the theory also hold water for an athlete's goals?
Thanks for any help. Like I said before, you guys are the most knowledgeable group I've found. I know I'll get good advice here or at least be pointed in the right direction.
Athlete cycle vs bodybuilder cycle
^^^ this
iv heard from reliable source that testing is tough enough that only a cruise dose of test and hgh (which they now test for)could pass in season
not anyone can play football, prob the sport with the most genetically gifted athletes
Re: Athlete cycle vs bodybuilder cycle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DJM
not anyone can play football, prob the sport with the most genetically gifted athletes
Genetically gifted physically maybe. Not necessarily mentally. ;)