Welcome back.
Welcome back.
Follow Me On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/heretostudy
Done.
I think a lot is going to hinge on their marketing, but since they're making it overseas and distributing it from there, they won't be subject to as much scrutiny. Besides that, Tren, Superdrone and very specific drug-like claims are what did PP in, for the most part, not the topicals.
All of this shit is gray area anyhow, at the end of the day. If the FDA wants your ass, they'll have it and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
^^To this end, if all of the topically applied stuff can be called skin creams and not have say, a testosterone molecule or really even the word testosterone anywhere near the packaging, that might get it through customs a tad easier.
Change the names to MandroEnhance, MandroHard, MandroSize and it'll sound like a sexual enhancement line of products.
All advice given is for entertainment value only. And it's free. Take it for what it's worth.
I don't think we know the basis on which the FDA moved on PP. But it's immaterial. The new legislation pending in Congress (and likely to pass this year) will criminalize all production, distribution, possession and use of any substance that is even remotely anabolic, with the exception of DHEA. Even DHEA will be subject to increased regulation, especially if it is in any form other than an orally administered one (in which case it will be classified as a "drug" rather than a "supplement").
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by Sperwer; 04-15-2013 at 08:36 AM.
"The purpose of today's training is to defeat yesterday's understanding."
Meanwhile, on the DMAA front, FDA has pulled the trigger
FDA: 'Information is insufficient to defend the use of DMAA'
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"The purpose of today's training is to defeat yesterday's understanding."