User Tag List

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 42
  1. #1
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    58
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    19-nor dhea (mg) ?

    Curious to know what is considered an effective dose of 19 Nor DHEA.

    Came by a product but it's only 18mg per cap

  2. #2
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 1 (100%) Freepressright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mount Vernon, OH
    Posts
    1,202
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Plain capsules administered orally (without special delivery system)

    300-600mg/day standalone
    200-300mg/day when stacked

    - - - Updated - - -

    18 milligrams of norDHEA won't do diddly shit

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Feedback Score 0 burlyman30's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,617
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: 19-nor dhea (mg) ?

    I don't know if anyone recalls the mg per capsule of androbulk, but it took 6 caps daily at a minimum.
    All advice given is for entertainment value only. And it's free. Take it for what it's worth.

  4. #4
    Established Member Feedback Score 0 Bucks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    655
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    19-nor dhea (mg) ?

    Androbulk 6 caps contained
    204mg 19 DHEA
    600mg 4 DHEA

  5. #5
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 1 (100%) Freepressright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mount Vernon, OH
    Posts
    1,202
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It is an absolute crime that no one has ever developed a topical 19norDHEA. This hormone in particular would be delivered exceptionally well with a topical carrier. The enzymatic conversion would be highly efficient.

    This is really an overlooked prohormone that no one has really developed or polished upon. PP did with AndroBulk, but it enjoyed relatively little recognition in the short timeframe it was available. Hopefully someone else will run with this one some day.

  6. #6
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    58
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I read if you could find the old ams decavol then use the caps w/ a carrier (iron legion) and there you go.
    not sure of any fillers and such....

  7. #7
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 1 (100%) Freepressright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mount Vernon, OH
    Posts
    1,202
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I read that as well. The only downside, I was told, is the smell. One of the reasons PP's AndroEnhance was so expensive was because they needed to find an odor-free version of 4DHEA. Winslow Jenkins over at PP assured me that 19norDHEA smells like rotting fish.

  8. #8
    Established Member Feedback Score 0 Right Hook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    146
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    19-nor dhea (mg) ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Freepressright View Post
    It is an absolute crime that no one has ever developed a topical 19norDHEA. This hormone in particular would be delivered exceptionally well with a topical carrier. The enzymatic conversion would be highly efficient.

    This is really an overlooked prohormone that no one has really developed or polished upon. PP did with AndroBulk, but it enjoyed relatively little recognition in the short timeframe it was available. Hopefully someone else will run with this one some day.
    Topical 19-norDHEA is not going to be any more efficient than other delivery methods such as sublingual or an oral with a fatty ester attached (likely less efficient). People who sell pro hormone transdermals neglect to tell you that the skin is also full of sulfotransferase enzymes. It's a neat thing to "forget" in marketing.

    Transdermals are also a clear and distinct violation of DSHEA guidance.

  9. #9
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    58
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Right Hook View Post
    Topical 19-norDHEA is not going to be any more efficient than other delivery methods such as sublingual or an oral with a fatty ester attached (likely less efficient). People who sell pro hormone transdermals neglect to tell you that the skin is also full of sulfotransferase enzymes. It's a neat thing to "forget" in marketing.

    Transdermals are also a clear and distinct violation of DSHEA guidance.
    I know not of the DSHEA but think that mfg's would market their goods as cosmetics rather than supplements to avoid the issue/violation.

  10. #10
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 1 (100%) Freepressright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mount Vernon, OH
    Posts
    1,202
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Right Hook View Post
    Topical 19-norDHEA is not going to be any more efficient than other delivery methods such as sublingual or an oral with a fatty ester attached (likely less efficient). People who sell pro hormone transdermals neglect to tell you that the skin is also full of sulfotransferase enzymes. It's a neat thing to "forget" in marketing.

    Transdermals are also a clear and distinct violation of DSHEA guidance.
    I've known a few in the chemistry end of things who would disagree with you, one being Jake from Antaeus labs.

    And with respect to DSHEA guidance, no one really knows what a "clear and distinct" violation is because there is no consistency in enforcement. If the FDA gets a hard on for you, no matter what you're selling, you're fucked.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •