User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    back to back cycles??

    I know this is a dumb question but...... what is the danger in running back to back cycles? for example, completed 4wk celtic d drol with 4wk pct , my schedule just got changed allowing me some extra time I would like to take advantage of in the gym, questioning another 4 wk of triumphalis ( it would be about 1 month since finishing pct from 1st cycle) am I just asking for trouble or is this doable???

  2. #2
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 1 (100%) nate3993's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    U did a 4 week cycle of celtic d drol? U mean diandrol? There's only a couple celtic products that would be worth running for only a month, but dianodrol wasn't one of em. Most celtic products should be run for a couple months. Celtic one? A month is fine. That stuff converts to M1T. Celtic mass that convverts to superdrol, that's fine for a month, but dam near everything else is kind of worthless at only a month.

    Take at LEAST another month off, and then run a cycle with some decent length to it. Unless ur talking about the harsher compounds I mentioned where as running those a month is the most you should be on em really.


    But either way. Wait at least another month.

  3. #3
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I intended on going longer but my back went out 4wks in I lost a week in the gym so I just started pct. I know protocol is time on =tie off I was curious if anyone could tell me the risk involved? Has anyone done something like what I'm considering? I'll probably not do this but I am thinking about it???

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Feedback Score 3 (100%) BBG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,489
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you intended on going longer, then yeah jump on. I love the time on/time off principal for general health, but people run 20+ week cycles... going 4 on cycle, 4 pct, 4 on cycle, 4 pct, then off is perfectly fine.
    Super not-not-moderator BBG

    Need extra cash? List of "Get Paid To" sites: Make $5 a day

  5. #5
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 0 Jelisej's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,026
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You'll see a lot of different opinions in here:
    how long between cycles dienazone

    ultimately, your health is your choice.

    Back to back cycles is like that one minute break between rounds in boxing much... And you're against Wladimir Klitchko.
    Last edited by Jelisej; 12-31-2013 at 09:49 AM.

  6. #6
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for replies guys,I know it's up to me but I respect the opinions on this board

  7. #7
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 0 Jelisej's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,026
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Of course, second opinion is always good.... what I ment is that you have different "schools", we all have different backgrounds, some guys are more liberal than others etc... Usually we are respectfull of each other opinion, but it would be impossible task to agree about cycle length, time off etc... And we all have different bodies as well.
    Personally, I'm probably more strict than anyone else, as its always better to be safe than sorry.
    So obviously my answer is, take time off and use gear on your next cycle,
    (Cycle + PCT) X2= time off, for example (13 + 13) x2= 26 weeks off
    or (4+4)X2= 16 weeks off
    Last edited by Jelisej; 12-31-2013 at 10:08 AM.

  8. #8
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    On a longer cycle I wouldn't consider I guess my thought was since I was only on 4wks it might not be that bad.

  9. #9
    Super Moderator Feedback Score 3 (100%) BBG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,489
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Biggyp View Post
    On a longer cycle I wouldn't consider I guess my thought was since I was only on 4wks it might not be that bad.
    4 week on, 4 week pct, 4 week on, 4 week pct, then off.... is healthier theoretically than just 8 straight weeks. If you had planned 8 weeks, you wouldn't have a problem doing another 4 right after this PCT is over. Then make sure you take enough time off.
    Super not-not-moderator BBG

    Need extra cash? List of "Get Paid To" sites: Make $5 a day

  10. #10
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That is kind of what I was thinking but my assumption was based on guesswork lol!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •