Looking up methylstenbolone pulls few results in google scholar as I try to find studies so I am just left with what blogs and companies claim.

M-sten is toxic due to the fact that it takes long to be metabolized, as I am reading here "due to its ability to resist metabolization" and here "because it is a di-methyl androgen resistant of typical metabolic deactivating pathways". This has to do with the liver but would this apply to androgen receptor clogging? A side effect of long cycles is that all the androgen receptors are filled with old androgens that already did their function and just sit in the receptor site.

This is just making me worried that M-sten might not be the best for maintaining gains post cycle, and longer depending on how long it takes to clear up the androgen receptors for natural test to fill in, I could be wrong and this only applies to the liver.


So how does this work?