User Tag List

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 56
  1. #11
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    90
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    After the last couple years of hearing FPR fantasize about 1-T like some past pussy, I'd like to hit it too.

  2. #12
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    58
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "I would market it under the Nitrogen Boosting premise, aka "NITRO BOOSTERS" since one of the benefits of such a product would be a positive nitrogen balance"

    Add UV protection and market it as a cosmetic sunscreen :-)

    Interested.

  3. #13
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 1 (100%) weekend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    seattle
    Posts
    1,877
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "Boosts nitrogen in skin to enhance collagen formation after sun exposure! SPF 8"

  4. #14
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ya i would buy some to!!!

  5. #15
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 1 (100%) Freepressright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mount Vernon, OH
    Posts
    1,202
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by weekend View Post
    Great product with one caveat. Gel carrier or bust. I would reformulate with these doses:

    150 mg 1dhea
    50 mg 4dhea
    50 mg 5dhea
    18 mg pregnenolone (don't know much about preg, so maybe lower or higher is best)

    Topical GEL CARRIER OR ITS USELESS
    The topical pregenolone brings you up where the 1-DHEA leaves you down. Stimulatory neuro-steroid and balances things out. Definitely a necessity to ward off the sides from the 1-DHEA.

    I can't even tell you my level of excitement thinking about this product making a comeback.

  6. #16
    Administrator Feedback Score 1 (100%) SoCal-Nutrition's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,009
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    this is still dangerous territory, and you must be willing and able to back this legally...and be prepared to legally defend yourself:

    HR 4771 states:
    "shall be
    considered to be an anabolic steroid for purposes of this Act if--
    ``(I) the drug or substance has been created or manufactured
    with the intent of producing a drug or other substance that
    either--
    ``(aa) promotes muscle growth; or
    ``(bb) otherwise causes a pharmacological effect similar to
    that of testosterone; or
    ``(II) the drug or substance has been, or is intended to be,
    marketed or otherwise promoted in any manner suggesting that
    consuming it will promote muscle growth or any other
    pharmacological effect similar to that of testosterone.
    ``(ii) A substance shall not be considered to be a drug or hormonal
    substance for purposes of this subparagraph if it--
    ``(I) is--
    ``(aa) an herb or other botanical;
    ``(bb) a concentrate, metabolite, or extract of, or a
    constituent isolated directly from, an herb or other botanical;
    or
    ``(cc) a combination of 2 or more substances described in
    item (aa) or (bb);
    ``(II) is a dietary ingredient for purposes of the Federal
    Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.); and
    ``(III) is not anabolic or androgenic."

    This section is what causes a lot of concern for folks in the industry
    www.SoCal-Nutrition.com
    Use Coupon code SWOLE5 to save 5% on all orders
    Prescription Nutrition Now Available!

  7. #17
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 1 (100%) Freepressright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mount Vernon, OH
    Posts
    1,202
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In other words, it's all about the marketing.

    Market it as a natural cosmetic that can aid in nitrogen retention, and it seems to me you can avoid a lot of this slippery slope.

  8. #18
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 3 (100%) Scope75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Salad Bowl, CA
    Posts
    3,346
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It could always just be made for Animal Research Only.

  9. #19
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Curling in the squat rack
    Posts
    89
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SoCal-Nutrition View Post
    this is still dangerous territory, and you must be willing and able to back this legally...and be prepared to legally defend yourself:

    HR 4771 states:
    "shall be
    considered to be an anabolic steroid for purposes of this Act if--
    ``(I) the drug or substance has been created or manufactured
    with the intent of producing a drug or other substance that
    either--
    ``(aa) promotes muscle growth; or
    ``(bb) otherwise causes a pharmacological effect similar to
    that of testosterone; or
    ``(II) the drug or substance has been, or is intended to be,
    marketed or otherwise promoted in any manner suggesting that
    consuming it will promote muscle growth or any other
    pharmacological effect similar to that of testosterone.

    ``(ii) A substance shall not be considered to be a drug or hormonal
    substance for purposes of this subparagraph if it--
    ``(I) is--
    ``(aa) an herb or other botanical;
    ``(bb) a concentrate, metabolite, or extract of, or a
    constituent isolated directly from, an herb or other botanical;
    or
    ``(cc) a combination of 2 or more substances described in
    item (aa) or (bb);
    ``(II) is a dietary ingredient for purposes of the Federal
    Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.); and
    ``(III) is not anabolic or androgenic."

    This section is what causes a lot of concern for folks in the industry
    "has been" would mean that you cannot use the exact formula right?

  10. #20
    Established Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I used 1T twice. It was my first "NitroBooster" I used after the 2005 ban. Pre ban I had used 1AD (my fav) a couple times, Superdrol a couple time and whatever shiny bottle the Supplement store guy gave me. I didn’t research anything them....

    1-T was my first Nitrobooster that I really researched and investigated before trying. It is was what hooked me on Primordial. FPR is right, it was really good. I ran it solo, 2 bottles, 6weeks, 10lbs gained, really good strength gains, felt great, super motivated to lift. Im sure my memories are magnified a little because it was a supplement that actually worked at the time when everything else was crap. The lotion was ok but the gel sounds way better. I would shower then apply in front of a fan. It took a couple minutes to dry just like regular lotion.
    Welsey, the way you feel on EpiAndro products is the way I felt on this. I don’t get the degree of awesome buzz you guys get from the Epi andro products. Tried the liquvade 1-T and it was crap. I got nothing from it.

    $120 for 6 weeks, 10lbs, easy on the liver, and fairly easy to recover from with OTC PCT, I'd buy it again. Beta test me please Lol.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •