Thanks to advice from clever chaps here on swole, i am feeling much better after controlling Estrogen which lowered my SHBG, and i now find myself asking all sorts of questions on Estrogen that i have not seen the answers to on the net.
So:
1- Too low E can result in bad cardio outcomes, as well as bone health, libido, muscle issues, etc. and the aromatase enzyme tends to be found in fat right? So can someone tell me how super skinny guys at age 18 with ultra low body fat are healthier with more energy than at any other time in life, even though their E must be very low indeed right? - same thing for endurance runners with super low fat percentage - how do they not have stress fractures all the time?
2- Regards the above mentioned poor outcomes related to low E: these outcomes appear common knowledge now on the web in general. Is it that the studies and outcomes related to low E are because people with low E often also have low T too, which usually means a relatively high SHBG, so basically piss poor androgen levels, resulting in fatigue, poor diet and exercise etc. ultimately equating to poor outcome. So a cause and effect issue with the stats?
3- I am at risk of answering my own questions here, but logically i would guess that super fit or young guys with low fat percentage and thus low E are not at risk from the standard poor outcomes listed all over the web because they also have high T and low SHBG, so overral they have high free androgen, even if their free E is still very low. Maybe these guys have developed more densely populated E receptors too. Or is it that E2 is higher as a proportion of the 3 E's and E2 does the bulk of the work?
Anyone know why?