Originally Posted by
Hulk Smash
Now I see where Bizbee is coming from...
Whether or not Baylor is truly benevolent and genuine remains for everyone to decide on their own.
I personally doubt the claims they or PH makes for a few reasons:
1. First and foremost Baylor has failed to have all current chemical hair loss drugs classified as poisons to all men (each in varying severity, but still poisoned). I know some say that its a relatively small percentage of men that fall into pfs. Some say its genetics that play a factor. I'm about 90% sure in the bit of studying I've done and mere observation that those claims are false. Also, proving that fin and other drugs are 100% poison should have been Baylor's approach from day one. It hasn't been. You know whats sad? Its not even difficult to have proven this. Would only take about 3-5 years tops. And they would have had all the funding needed just from proving that.
Why do I hold this stance on fin and Baylor? To give a simple logical reason: take steroids for example, everyone knows not to mess with it because of the inhibition it does to natural testosterone production and all the other effects with it. Everyone knows those effects happen to every man and woman that uses it. Its purely and simply bio-chemistry. There are no genetics involved to explain or "cause" its initial effects on men. No one is super-man and can take steroids without issue, just the same with fin, sp and other things.
I think I know what Baylor has found that "proves its incurable".
I could go into that but I won't as this would be a longer reply and I don't know if you all want to hear my take on that.
Baylor hasn't tried and tested this regimen, and until they do, they would be falsely claiming there being no remedy.
Bizbee, how many things were thought incurable until one day someone found the cure?