User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Super Moderator Feedback Score 0 burlyman30's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,617
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Intramuscular vs. Subcutaneous Injections

    I remember hearing a show on superhuman radio where a TRT doctor was highly in favor of subcutaneous injections over intramuscular. Did anyone else hear this show? What I cannot remember is all of his reasons for this. I think there is a difference in the "release time" of the compound into the body, but I have not found any studies showing this comparison.

    Anyone have input?
    All advice given is for entertainment value only. And it's free. Take it for what it's worth.

  2. #2
    Established Member Feedback Score 0 BoneDaddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    727
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In for this discussion

  3. #3
    Established Member Feedback Score 1 (100%) Rodja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    SubQ will give you a slower release, but it's hard to say how much slower compared to IM. The main area where subQ is better is scar tissue as subQ will cause less of it compared to IM.
    M. Ed. Ex Phys

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Feedback Score 2 (100%) h2s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,582
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tiny doses of peptides can give you a strange bump for a bit after subq injection (assuming you are relatively lean). I can only imagine what mLs would look like subq.

  5. #5
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    how about HCG? seems like a lot of people do IM when using it as ancillary. any specific reason here?

  6. #6
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 0 Jelisej's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,026
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rodja View Post
    SubQ will give you a slower release, but it's hard to say how much slower compared to IM. The main area where subQ is better is scar tissue as subQ will cause less of it compared to IM.
    This is correct. IM gives more of the peak, and in total calculations you get slightly more for your money, SQ is bit slower realease. Downside of SQ is that you cant inject very viscous compounds, and volume is more limited as well.
    Studies say that with test e aromatisation is similar- but reports from the "field" guts say that there is bit more aromatisation with SQ.
    Benefit of SQ is that its more convinient and its easier for more frequent injections to use SQ.

  7. #7
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0 AestheticOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    86
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    in on this thread

  8. #8

  9. #9
    Super Moderator Feedback Score 0 burlyman30's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,617
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    repped ^^^ nice job finding that, Ice.
    All advice given is for entertainment value only. And it's free. Take it for what it's worth.

  10. #10
    Established Member Feedback Score 2 (100%) Coolazice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    599
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by burlyman30 View Post
    repped ^^^ nice job finding that, Ice.
    Thanks! I had to do some serious digging around in my email to locate it, but I sent that link to myself for future listening all the way back in March... and I still haven't listened to all of it. lol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •