User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wanna learn about EMFs? Check this 35 world experts free interviews: EMF Health Summit 2018 - Free Online 9-15th December! (Kruse is my favourite)

  2. #12
    Established Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    139
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pablo View Post
    Mmm difficult so say, it probably depends on your budget. I wanna say that Im not an expert at all on EMF, I just have read several books and studies and think that it is an issue for any kind of health recovery and that it is wise to reduce exposure. That said, I would probably recommend one of the following:

    -I have an "Accousticom 2", and it is quite precise for meassuring things like mobile phones, antennas, wifi and "smart" meters. Youll also notice that most microwaves leak a lot of MW, so if you probably wont use/ stay near them anymore. Now I like it, is super simple. Main drawback is it doesnt meassure thinks like power lines or home appliances. Ill probably buy another separate meter to test that in the near future,

    -Other 2 meters that people usually recommend a lot are the Trifield TF2 (https://www.amazon.com/TriField-EMF-...ield+tf2&psc=1) or the Cornet EDT88 (the link is the older model, I didnt find the new one: https://www.amazon.com/Cornet-ED78S-...ctrosmog+meter)

    Basically these two last meters are much more versatile, and meassure a wider range of frequencies, but they are not very accurate for some of them.

    I got the first one because I was willing to spend another 100-150 euros in another one and meassuring most things accurately (300-350€ total). Maybe if you are just willing to spend 180€ you should get one of the 2 last ones. I cannot tell you to buy any specific model really. Do a bit of research first, I just think those are all good options to get a general idea. Before spending money research a bit about EMF dangers and decide weather you think it is a real danger or just bullshit. I think it is a danger, but it wasnt until I read Martin Blanks "Overpowered" that I got fully convinced.

    I hope this helps...
    Thanks for all the info, very helpful indeed.
    Going to do more research but I believe it is a health issue and is only getting worse (eg 5g), so will take some steps to reduce my exposure.

  3. #13
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, right now I see it as the biggest health challenge we are going to face as a society in the next years. Ill avoid it as much as I can until Im totally recovered from this finasteride mess. Then Ill make some hardcore opposition to EMFs and ask for changes in the law (less emissions permited), inform people, etc.

    In fact, Im already connecting with people concerned about this issue, but I dont want to lose my focus: First, total recovery. Second, changing (at least trying to change) some of the most fucked up things we, as stupid humans, are doing. Also Ill have to think about my future career, about having awesome sex (something this PFS totally prevente us from) and having and awesome life experience basically... You know, all those things we should do and have... So I would say: PRIORITIZE!!!!

  4. #14
    Established Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    139
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pablo View Post
    Yeah, right now I see it as the biggest health challenge we are going to face as a society in the next years. Ill avoid it as much as I can until Im totally recovered from this finasteride mess. Then Ill make some hardcore opposition to EMFs and ask for changes in the law (less emissions permited), inform people, etc.

    In fact, Im already connecting with people concerned about this issue, but I dont want to lose my focus: First, total recovery. Second, changing (at least trying to change) some of the most fucked up things we, as stupid humans, are doing. Also Ill have to think about my future career, about having awesome sex (something this PFS totally prevente us from) and having and awesome life experience basically... You know, all those things we should do and have... So I would say: PRIORITIZE!!!!
    Amen dude, btw, is it true that we can have all these electronics with a different, safer frequency? But for some reason we chose microwave radiation which is dangerous.

  5. #15
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am not sure what you are referring to. Wired= Safe , Wireless= Not safe. I guess you mean if wireless could be safe if the frequency was changed. Im not sure, I have to investigate it more, but I think so. According to Dr. Dietritch Klinghardt 2.4 GHz, which is used for most cell phones, wifi, etc., is one of the worst frequencies for living beings, and he suggested that transmiting with a different frequency could reduce harm or even be harmless, so that we just needed to test which frecuencies posed no problems and use those.

    I was encouraged when I heard that, for sure. However, I cannot tell how true is that, I am neither an engineer nor a biophysics expert - at the moment hehe- so Ill have to study it more.

    Also, I heard about a router with "eco-wifi" that emits 90% less radiation or something like that. As people wake up to this issue I bet therell be tech advances, but right now wireless looks pretty crappy to me.

  6. #16
    Established Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    139
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Pablo View Post
    I am not sure what you are referring to. Wired= Safe , Wireless= Not safe. I guess you mean if wireless could be safe if the frequency was changed. Im not sure, I have to investigate it more, but I think so. According to Dr. Dietritch Klinghardt 2.4 GHz, which is used for most cell phones, wifi, etc., is one of the worst frequencies for living beings, and he suggested that transmiting with a different frequency could reduce harm or even be harmless, so that we just needed to test which frecuencies posed no problems and use those.

    I was encouraged when I heard that, for sure. However, I cannot tell how true is that, I am neither an engineer nor a biophysics expert - at the moment hehe- so Ill have to study it more.

    Also, I heard about a router with "eco-wifi" that emits 90% less radiation or something like that. As people wake up to this issue I bet therell be tech advances, but right now wireless looks pretty crappy to me.
    Yeah, that's what I meant, that could be hopeful then, if it works (using different frequencies).
    I just changed internet providers and have a new router, not sure how much EMF it emits, it's not a smart hub (are they worse, idk?).
    But I'm definitely going to look into those eco WiFi routers, thanks for letting me know about them.

  7. #17
    Moderator Feedback Score 0 Cdsnuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    3,300
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    https://www.shopqlink.com/

    I've had one for years. I'm not an affiliate for them...yet
    Total Male Optimization "People who say it can't be done shouldn't interrupt those that are doing it"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •