Tyranny in America? Somewhat funny vid

[longBallLima]

No, I haven't lost a child to gun violence - thank God. It's not an assumption either...I've lost people I knew/cared for from gun violence. I've had a gun stuck in my face on a few occasions though and it doesn't change the way I feel about them.

Have you lost a child to gun violence?

It is a big time assumption because you haven't been in the situation. You project what you would feel or how you would act. that is what an assumption is.

and i'll pull back from the personal stuff.

and enough is enough with the insults, carry on if you will, i'll disengage.

[BBG]

Guns are banned in China - literally, the police are not allowed to have guns. Only the military. Crazy people still use guns to kill people: China attack illustrates U.S. gun law divide - CNN.com

[longBallLima]

I'm not your bro and don't call me a liar when you weren't there. If you really need me to, I'll PM you the dudes name and you can check out the police records since he ended up being arrested for it.

? I fail to see where he called you a liar. He said it is not unlikely that happened to you.

[Rodja]

The onus of proof isn't on me. You offered up something as fact and I asked you to prove it with valid sources and you say you can't/won't (and then in turn tell me to disprove). That's pedantic and immature arguing.

I could say "an apple a day keeps the doctor away" and if challenged, the responsibility of proof is on myself (the one making the claim). You haven't written very many papers in your day have you?

Nice to see someone here knows some logical fallacies when they see it.

[Coolazice]

The onus of proof isn't on me. You offered up something as fact and I asked you to prove it with valid sources and you say you can't/won't (and then in turn tell me to disprove). That's pedantic and immature arguing.

I could say "an apple a day keeps the doctor away" and if challenged, the responsibility of proof is on myself (the one making the claim). You haven't written very many papers in your day have you?

If someone wants to say something is wrong, then they need to prove that point. You dimwits are the ones that are misdefining what an assault rifle is and that is one of the main points in the information.

[bikeswimlive]

I'm not your bro and don't call me a liar when you weren't there. If you really need me to, I'll PM you the dudes name and you can check out the police records since he ended up being arrested for it.

Why so hostile bro?

Please re-read I said "not unlikely" which means likely (aka I agreed with what you said). Kent State (near you) offers a wide array of Adult Education and Literacy courses. Ohio Literacy Resource Center

[longBallLima]

Guns are banned in China - literally, the police are not allowed to have guns. Only the military. Crazy people still use guns to kill people: China attack illustrates U.S. gun law divide - CNN.com

not kill. the article even delineates this. the main difference here is 22 injured children X 22 dead children.

as much as no one wants to see a hurt child, the sandy hook parents would gladly trade the attacks.

[Coolazice]

? I fail to see where he called you a liar. He said it is not unlikely that happened to you.

Oops... I misread that as not likely. My apologies.

- - - Updated - - -

Why so hostel bro?

Please re-read I said "not unlikely" which means likely (aka I agreed with what you said). Kent State (near you) offers a wide array of Adult Education and Literacy courses. Ohio Literacy Resource Center

I already apologized for misreading that and incorrectly replying. It was somewhat hostile because I read it as being called a liar.

[longBallLima]

hostile*

[Rodja]

If someone wants to say something is wrong, then they need to prove that point. You dimwits are the ones that are misdefining what an assault rifle is and that is one of the main points in the information.

You just added argument from ignorance to your logical fallacies.

Here's some reading for you since you don't seem to know what you're doing here:
Philosophic burden of proof - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia