Maybe a bit of a derail here, sorry for that. But what irks me sometimes when people bring up “PFS recoveries” is that it is such a vague thing to say. I don’t know this case but it sounds like he had sexual issues, which he alleviated by taking large doses of a quality aphrodisiac. Maybe that isn’t that far fetched?

People start arguing when bringing up solutions and protocols because everyone seems to have varying interpretations of what PFS is based on personal symptoms. To me the thought of mass dosing tribulus will onviously not appeal since my issues are mental. And then you have CD who had every symptom in the book and was going through hell on a yearly basis. So I can’t blame CD or his peers when he is condescending when it comes to these ‘bite sized protocols’, while he figured out an all encompassing and multifaceted way of going forward.

All these protocols are nice to know, and I appreciate you bringing it up and experimenting with it. But people need to look at these things with adjusted expectations. At the same time I wish others would take caution when declaring solutions when it just doesn’t apply to everyone.

Sorry for the psuedo rant here, and it’s not personal at all. It’s just something that has bothered me for a while. I remember endlessly roaming PH back in the days reading of all kinds of protocols that where supposed to fix my issues when in the end my issues where maybe not even relevant.

‘X fixed his PFS with Y’ is just a bit if a pet peeve for me as everyone has his own mental image of what PFS means to them.