User Tag List

Page 22 of 44 FirstFirst ... 12202122232432 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 435
  1. #211
    SwoleSource Member Feedback Score 0 bikeswimlive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by longBallLima View Post
    shoot the burden of proof
    I see what you did there...

  2. #212
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bikeswimlive View Post
    I see what you did there...
    LOL

  3. #213
    Established Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Fly over country
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Tyranny in America? Somewhat funny vid

    Quote Originally Posted by Rodja View Post
    Zero personal issues, but your arguments are fallacious. A fallacious argument needs to be pointed out.
    So is the weakness of the argument that laws prevent crimes going to be addressed on its merits? All law is applicable to the degree to which it can be enforced (paraphrasing a Supreme Court justice). It is irrelevant what guns are allowed because law abiding citizens won't, by definition, use a gun to commit a crime. Banning the sales of guns does little to stop the violence, in part because of the prevalence of weapons already in circulation. So, if criminals are criminal because they don't follow laws, what will one more law serve? Nothing.

  4. #214
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Macdon1588 View Post
    So is the weakness of the argument that laws prevent crimes going to be addressed on its merits? All law is applicable to the degree to which it can be enforced (paraphrasing a Supreme Court justice). It is irrelevant what guns are allowed because law abiding citizens won't, by definition, use a gun to commit a crime. Banning the sales of guns does little to stop the violence, in part because of the prevalence of weapons already in circulation. So, if criminals are criminal because they don't follow laws, what will one more law serve? Nothing.
    Don't James Holmes and Adam Lanza disprove the notion that law abiding citizens are not dangerous with guns??

  5. #215
    Established Member Feedback Score 2 (100%) Coolazice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    599
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Today happens to be the 1 year anniversary of the death of a classmate and friend of mine from high school. She was shot and killed in her driveway by her longtime boyfriend, just 4 doors (a couple hundred feet) from my grandma's house. Still, I don't blame the gun. If he didn't have a gun, he would have found a different way to accomplish his goals. He was a twisted individual and was set on ending her life no matter what. He died by his own hand like many of the other cowards that choose that path. I think one of the worst parts about it is that her daughter lost both parents that night.
    Last edited by Coolazice; 01-24-2013 at 02:23 AM.

  6. #216
    Established Member Feedback Score 1 (100%) Rodja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Macdon1588 View Post
    So is the weakness of the argument that laws prevent crimes going to be addressed on its merits? All law is applicable to the degree to which it can be enforced (paraphrasing a Supreme Court justice). It is irrelevant what guns are allowed because law abiding citizens won't, by definition, use a gun to commit a crime. Banning the sales of guns does little to stop the violence, in part because of the prevalence of weapons already in circulation. So, if criminals are criminal because they don't follow laws, what will one more law serve? Nothing.
    Red herring there, buddy.

    The whole gun debate is full of fallacious arguments as it's an overly complex issue that cannot be easily legislated or solved due to the multiple avenues of obtaining a gun.

    Bottom line is that something needs to change as the current approach is obviously not working. Whether it be some form of restriction on firearms, more rigorous methods for legally obtaining one, extra firearm safety/awareness, etc., something needs to be done and the people sitting on their asses screaming, "2nd amendment!!" are holding shit back. There's a lot of parallels here between gun reform and healthcare reform in that people are bitching about potential changes being implemented yet the current system isn't working.
    M. Ed. Ex Phys

  7. #217
    Super Moderator Feedback Score 0 burlyman30's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,617
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Tyranny in America? Somewhat funny vid

    Commercial break, guys...

    I started all this by asking h2s' views. I stated some of my own. I don't agree with certain views and you won't all agree with mine. But PLEASE let's keep this civil. There is no need to call anyone ignorant or assholes here. Leave the personal attacks out of it.

    If you disagree just state the reason, i.e. "the numbers I've seen disagree with this sentiment " vs. saying "You're an idiot".

    Disagreement and dissenting is fine. But we have some great people here... let's not tear each other up over this.

    So... this whole thing started with my question... my fault, I guess. I know this is a heated topic with strong beliefs on both sides.

    Carry on.
    All advice given is for entertainment value only. And it's free. Take it for what it's worth.

  8. #218
    Established Member Feedback Score 2 (100%) Coolazice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    599
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by burlyman30 View Post
    Commercial break, guys...

    I started all this by asking h2s' views. I stated some of my own. I don't agree with certain views and you won't all agree with mine. But PLEASE let's keep this civil. There is no need to call anyone ignorant or assholes here. Leave the personal attacks out of it.

    If you disagree just state the reason, i.e. "the numbers I've seen disagree with this sentiment " vs. saying "You're an idiot".

    Disagreement and dissenting is fine. But we have some great people here... let's not tear each other up over this.

    So... this whole thing started with my question... my fault, I guess. I know this is a heated topic with strong beliefs on both sides.

    Carry on.
    This can't be blamed on you, Burly. This same debate is on the tip of a lot of peoples tongues and is happening at thousands of water coolers worldwide right now. Point taken though.

  9. #219
    A 1k Club Member Feedback Score 0
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by burlyman30 View Post
    Commercial break, guys...

    I started all this by asking h2s' views. I stated some of my own. I don't agree with certain views and you won't all agree with mine. But PLEASE let's keep this civil. There is no need to call anyone ignorant or assholes here. Leave the personal attacks out of it.

    If you disagree just state the reason, i.e. "the numbers I've seen disagree with this sentiment " vs. saying "You're an idiot".

    Disagreement and dissenting is fine. But we have some great people here... let's not tear each other up over this.

    So... this whole thing started with my question... my fault, I guess. I know this is a heated topic with strong beliefs on both sides.

    Carry on.
    you have no fault here burly, sorry for my indulgence in shitty behavior.

  10. #220
    Super Moderator Feedback Score 3 (100%) BBG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,489
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by longBallLima View Post
    not kill. the article even delineates this. the main difference here is 22 injured children X 22 dead children.

    as much as no one wants to see a hurt child, the sandy hook parents would gladly trade the attacks.
    The article actually mentions that the guy used a knife, not a gun. I didn't mean to be misleading with what I originally typed...

    I'm not for gun control, but that guy attacked a bunch of kids with a knife and didn't kill any. They would easily all be dead if a gun was used.
    Super not-not-moderator BBG

    Need extra cash? List of "Get Paid To" sites: Make $5 a day

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •